Being a log of the genealogical, research, book-collecting, book-making, and book-fixing adventures of Kylie
Showing posts with label research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label research. Show all posts

Friday, March 17, 2017

Military Records: CMSR and pension indexes

One of the original purposes of starting this blog was to share my love of genealogy as well as share my knowledge and things I've picked up along the way.

I've recently been doing a lot of research in military pension and service records at the Archives.  My friend Joe* came with me the other day and made the comment "How are regular people supposed to know all of this?"

I'm really lucky in my combination of skills, education, and experience that makes me uniquely qualified to do genealogy research.  As Joe pointed out, there are some things I learned in my work at the National Archives that "normal" researchers don't know.  They can learn it, there just isn't anyone to tell them from the beginning like there was for me.

So I want to share some of that knowledge :)

First: what is a military pension or service record?

I'll answer the second part of that question first.  A Service Record, or, fully, a Compiled Military Service Record (CMSR), is pretty much exactly what the name implies - a compiled record of an individual's service in the military.  I'm not as familiar with records post Civil War, so I can't really speak for those.  I would guess they would be about the same.  But Civil War (and War of 1812, and Indian War, and everything preceding...) CMSRs are a series of cards that indicate an individual's service during the war.  The cards will indicate things like the date and place that the individual enlisted, where they were at certain points during their service, how much money they were paid...

CMSRs were created around the turn of the 20th century from gigantic log books that were kept during the war(s) that recorded all of this information.  Someone decided that it would be a whole lot easier to find a person in the huge log book (and therefore prove the individual's service, which is part of the requirement for obtaining a pension) if there were cards that indicated this information and then were compiled into one folder.  So, it was someone's job (or lots of someones) to go through the log books and make a card every time someone's name appears.  And then all of the cards for one person were put into a folder with his name and unit on it.

For the Civil War, all Confederate CMSRs have been digitized and are available on fold3.com.  fold3 is own by Ancestry, and is a subscription service.  Sometimes, local libraries will have subscriptions to fold3.  Family History Centers of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints have access to fold3 available for their patrons.  Find a Family History Center here. They are working on digitizing the Union service records, so some of them are on fold3 already, some are closed for digitization, and others are only available at the National Archives in Washington, DC.

I'll go onto pensions, then I'll return to CMSRs and show examples of what I'm talking about/what information you can gain from these records.

Pension records are when the individual returned, or didn't return, from the war injured or otherwise with his quality of life changed from what it was before the war.  There are four general categories of pensions - invalid, widows, minors, and mother/father pensions.  If the individual did return home, but was unable to work or carry on life as it was before the war, he could apply to receive a pension to ease the financial burden a little bit.  If the individual didn't return home from the war, his widow, child, or dependent mother or father could apply to receive a pension.  Sometimes, if the individual received a pension, but then passed away sometime later, his widow, dependent child, mother, or father could apply to continue to receive the pension.  In some cases, the line continued and the dependent child applied after the widow died.

Pensions have the possibility of containing a wealth of information.  When the individual applied for a pension, he had to prove service, as well as change in his situation.  There are often affidavits from friends and family who knew him both before and after the war, indicating the change in his personality.   There are surgeon certificates, from physical examinations from a surgeon indicating health issues.  If the individual received the pension, there will be information about how much the pension will be for, as well as any increase or decrease in the rate of the pension.  If a dependent applied for a pension, he/she would have to submit proof of relationship, so there is a chance there are things like marriage certificates, birth certificates, etc.  (They also have to prove the invalid died, so there may be a death certificate).  Every pension is unique, so there is no telling exactly what will be in the file without pulling it.  (That's what it's called when you go an request it from the National Archives) There is some information that the index card will indicate and hint at the possible information in the file.  I'll cover that in the examples section.

These poor people often had to jump through numerous hoops before they received a pension, so often there is a lot of information and often repeated information from different sources in the record.
Union pension records are located at the National Archives in Washington, DC.  Confederate pensions were issued on a state-by-state basis and are located at the state of issuance.

Examples

Here I'll talk about the general information that can be gleaned from a CMSR/pension index card.  In a later post, I'll go into more detail about requesting the records at the National Archives and the the information the can/may contain.

CMSR

Here I'll use the example of my very own ancestor's Civil War CMSR.  Marion Snyder was my 3x great grandfather on my mother's side.  He served in Company E of the 125th Ohio Infantry.  But, as I'll show you on the index card, he also served in another unit.


This is Marion Snyder's CMSR Index card.  At the top of the card, you see his name and unit.  The spelling of his name at the top of the card is important here.  Often, the name could have been misspelled in the log books.  Or, it could have been recorded with initials instead of his first or middle name.  They recorded it on the card exactly as it was spelled in the log book.  After the fact, when they were compiling the cards into a folder, they did their best to indicate if there is a different name spelling of the same individual.  The different name spellings would each be in their own folder, but on the index card on the section "see also," a reference to the different name spelling would be indicated.

Here's an example where that is the case ->

The index card will also indicate the individual's entering and exiting rank.  As I mentioned earlier, Marion's index card says "see also Vet. Res. Corps."  This is a reference to the Veteran Reserve Corp, a unit that individuals were often transferred to if they sustained illness or injury during the war that prevented their "normal" service, but that wasn't so severe that they could no longer serve.  This reference section means that there is another service record out there for Marion Snyder.  Service records were compiled according to unit, not individual.  So if a single individual had service in multiple units, there would be a service record for each unit.

Pension

There are a few different pension indexes, so the index cards you find may vary.

Let's take a look at one example to see what we can learn.


As you can see at the top of the card, this is the pension index for Marion Snyder.  Let's pretend we didn't learn about his service through the CMSR index card.  We will relearn it all through the pension index card.

If Marion's widow or children had applied for his pension after his death, their names would appear in the section right under his name - Name of Dependent - Widow - Minor.

In the section just below that, we see what units Marion served in - F 8 V.R.C. and E 125 Ohio Inf.  Let's break that down - the E is referring to the company designator, 125 is the regiment number, Ohio is the state served and the Inf stands for infantry.  The "V.R.C." is another reference to the Veteran's Reserve Corps that I talked about above.  

If we had previous known the unit that Marion had served in, this is how we could verify that this pension index is referring to him.  This is especially helpful if the ancestor we are researching had common name.  The fact that both units are listed here tells us that unlike the CMSRs, all pension records referring to a single individual are compiled into the same folder.  If a widow or dependent had applied, those pension applications/certificates would be in the same folder.  

The table in the middle of the card is the part that gives us the important information when it comes to requesting the pension.  Reading from left to right - under "date of filing" - 1890 July 25 - is the date that Marion applied for his pension. This is important - if we knew that Marion had died in 1889, for example, than the Marion Snyder who applied for a pension in 1890 could not be our Marion.  

The row indicates who is applying for the pension - the numbers are in the "invalid" row, so it was the soldier applying for the pension.  Although invalid is a term that has come to mean someone disabled through injury or illness, it doesn't always mean that in the context of a pension.  However, to receive a pension, soldiers often had to prove illness or injury that meant affected their quality of life after the war.  For example - if they couldn't prefer the same job that they had before the war due to an injury, and could not therefore support themselves in the same way as they could before the war, they could apply for a pension.

The first column is the application number and the second column is the certificate number.  Really, the most important number is the last one - the certificate number.  This is the number that everything is filed under.  The numbers are really meaningless at this point - they are really only given meaning in the context of the National Archives and pulling the record.  The National Archives is made up of stacks - rows upon rows of records.  The pension records are sorted into boxes and organized by number.  Providing this number to the Archives will tell the "puller" - the person who goes and retrieves the record - where in the maze of stacks to go to find the particular record you want.  But we'll cover that in a later post.

The last column is the state Marion filed for his pension from - Ohio.  This doesn't always have to be the same state where the soldier served from.  Here's something to keep in mind when searching ancestry.com and fold3.com for the indexes - Ancestry's index is searchable by state filed from, while Fold3's is searchable by the state served from.

At the bottom is listed the Attorney that Marion went through to apply for his pension.  Meaningless, except for the fact that there were several big name attorneys in Washington DC that were almost exclusively pension attorneys, judging by the number of pensions they sponsored.  

Let's look at one more index card.


This is the pension for John Doe.

We see that John Doe is an alias for John Brinnan.  He served in Co. D of the 198th Regiment in the New York infantry.  There are numbers in the second row of the central table - this tells us that John's widow applied for his pension to be transferred to her after his death.  Her name is given in the name of dependents section just below the soldier's name - Hattie Brinnan.  But since there is only a number in the application column, this means that she applied for the pension but her request was not approved.  The dates on the far left are telling - John applied for the pension in 1910 and Hattie applied in 1920, meaning that John had died sometime between those two dates.  

Here's an important note - see that number at the very bottom of the card? C2469705.  This is called the "C number" - creative, I know.  Basically, when the pensions were transferred from the Bureau of Pensions - a sub-section of the Department of the Interior - to the Department of Veteran's Affairs (VA) when the VA was created in 1930, the VA decided to renumber any active pension files.  This number is important - if a C number exists, this is the number that the pension will be filed under and the one that the Archives needs to retrieve the file.

There is no hard and fast rule for where the pensions are located but generally pre-WWI pensions are located at the National Archives in DC, post-WWI are in St. Louis, and random pensions are still with the VA.

to be continued...

So that's it! A brief - it ended up not so brief I know - introduction into military records and their indexes.  Coming up: how to request the records from the National Archives, and what is in the files.  If you have ideas for posts or a question that you'd like me to answer, feel free to send it my way at k.ladd.research@gmail.com!

Disclaimer: I am not an expert.  I have a lot of knowledge and experience but if I got anything wrong, please let me know!

*Amusing - I started writing this post in January of 2015.  Lots of stuff happened which took me away from posting for a while.  One of those things that took me away - my "friend Joe" is now my husband Joe. :D

Thursday, March 2, 2017

Enumeration Districts and How to Use Them

Scenario: You have located a family in the 1930 census but can't find them in the 1940 census.

Case Study: Lawrence McGuire was living at home with his father Charles McGuire and mother Margaret in Brooklyn, New York in 1930.  But where was the family in 1940? A simple ancestry.com search isn't bringing them up.

Let's take a look at the 1930 census and see what it can tell us.


There is the family in the 1930 census.  I know, it's kind of hard to see.  Here is a closer view:


McGire, Charles P.          Head
     ---   , Margaret M.      Wife
     ---   , Catherine B.      daughter
     ---   , Anna I.              daughter
     ---   , Thomas F.         son
     ---   , Margaret M.     daughter
     ---   , John J.              son
     ---   , Lawrence C.    son
     ---   , Helen R.          daughter

(last name is misspelled, but that's them)

I'm not going to go over all of the information the census records tell us - I did a little of that in A Study in Census. I'm just going to point out the information that will help us find the family in the 1940 census.

First - the assumptions.  For the purposes of our study, I am assuming that the family lives in the same house in 1940 as they did in 1930.

The first 4 columns of the 1930 census list this information:

In column 1, next to the McGuires we see "Brooklyn Avenue."  Next to Charles McGuire, in column 2, it says "1661."  So the McGuire's live in 1661 Brooklyn Avenue.  Columns 3-4 don't really give us any useful information - they just number the houses and families that the census taker has been to that day.

Like I said above, we are going to assume that the McGuires lived at 1661 Brooklyn Avenue in 1940.  But how do we find 1661 Brooklyn Avenue in the 1940 census? Rough estimate, there are hundreds of census pages covering Brooklyn.

We are going to find it according to enumeration district. As defined by the National Archives,

An enumeration district, as used by the Bureau of the Census, was an area that could be covered by a single enumerator (census taker) in one census period. Enumeration districts varied in size from several city blocks in densely populated urban areas to an entire county in sparsely populated rural areas. 
Enumeration district maps show the boundaries and the numbers of the census enumeration districts, which were established to help administer and control data collection. Wards, precincts, incorporated areas, urban unincorporated areas, townships, census supervisors` districts, and congressional districts may also appear on some maps. The content of enumeration district maps vary greatly. The base maps were obtained locally and include postal route maps, General Land Office maps, soil survey maps, and maps produced by city, county, and state government offices as well as commercial printers. Census officials then drew the enumeration district boundaries and numbers on these base maps.

The enumeration district can usually be found in the upper right hand corner of the census page.


As you can see above, 1661 Brooklyn Avenue was in Enumeration District (E.D) 24-823 (the 8 looks like it could be a 5, but by comparing to other numbers on the page, I determine that it an 8).

So now we just need to go find E.D. 24-823 in 1940, right? Wrong.  That would be way too easy.  E.D.s change year by year.  Luck for us, there is an awesome guy named Steve Morse, PhD, who gave us a handy dandy Unified Census ED Finder.  

And as I'm writing this, I see that we could have just entered the address and found the enumeration district that way..... Shhhhhh. That'll be our little secret.


Under the heading "If you know the 1930 ED for this location enter it here" we will enter 24-823.

We get two possible EDs as an output.  Clicking on the ED will take you to a page where you can select how you want to view the pages - NARA, familysearch, ancestry... Unfortunately now it's a matter of going through the census page-by-page until you find the person you are looking for.  At least now it's 30 pages rather than hundreds of pages.  As I'm going through, I am looking both for the street address (1661 Brooklyn Avenue) and the family name (McGuire).

Uh oh! I found where 1661 Brooklyn Avenue should be... but it's not there.

It skips from 1660 Brooklyn Avenue to 1664 Brooklyn Avenue.  

If this happens to you - don't give up hope! It probably means that the family wasn't home when the census taker came 'round.  Usually there is a section after everything else where the census taker goes back and catches the houses he missed the first time.

So we keep going.... and on page 3A of ED 24-2264B, there they are.




Here's why we couldn't find them - last name is spelled Maguire, not McGuire (or even McGire as the 1930 misspelling was), Charles is shorted to Chas, and Lawrence is spelled Laurence.  Also, they are listed as living ay 1663, not 1661.


So there you have it! A brief introduction into enumeration districts and how to use them.


Edit: While writing this post, I discovered that Steve Morse has a functionality where you can simply put in a known address and it will direct you to the census pages... but that's not as fun. ;)


Thursday, February 26, 2015

My Moonshiner Ancestors

I'm from real southern folk, y'all.

An often over-looked source of genealogical information is newspapers.  There are many places to find historic newspapers - libraries, universities, Google, historical societies, etc.  One of my favorites, and the best/most complete, is Chronicling America from the Library of Congress. From the website:

Chronicling America is a Website providing access to information about historic newspapers and select digitized newspaper pages, and is produced by the National Digital Newspaper Program (NDNP). NDNP, a partnership between the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and the Library of Congress (LC), is a long-term effort to develop an Internet-based, searchable database of U.S. newspapers with descriptive information and select digitization of historic pages. Supported by NEH, this rich digital resource will be developed and permanently maintained at the Library of Congress. An NEH award program will fund the contribution of content from, eventually, all U.S. states and territories.1

Upon searching said site for the keyword "Ladd," I stumbled upon this:
Wait, WHAT?

Here's the full story:
THE SENTINEL
D. F. BRADLEY, Editor
PICKENS C. H., S. C.:
Thursday, June 13, 1878

Murder by Revenue Officials - A Man 
Shot Down in Cold Blood
   On last Sunday, the 9th instant, about 1 
o'clock, four Revenue officials by the name 
of Mouse (or Moose,) Durham, Kane and
Scruggs, (we do not know their initials), went
to the house of Mrs. Ladd, a widow lady,
living in the mountainous section of this
county, and brutally murdered her son Amos
Ladd, a young man, aged about 21 years.--
We have not the full particulars of this most
atrocious and fiendish murder, but will give
briefly, only what has come to us, as we con-
sider it, well authenticated, and reserve fil-
ler particulars for a future time, when all the
facts can be properly brought out. It ap-
pears that the young man was standing, or
rather leaning, against the door facing, when 
the Revenue officials rode up, or walked up,
(we believe they were walking,) and delib-
erately shot him dead on the spot without a
moments warning or an intimation of their
designs.  The young man fell out of the door 
lifeless, when the officials said to his brother,
"who have we shot!" The reply was, "you
have shot my brother." The officers then
turned and left the house, but concealed
themselves on a small hill near the house in
 the brush, and remained there for some time,
for what purpose it is not known.  They then
went to the store of Mr. King, some four mills
off, where they endeavored to hire a convey-
ance to Easley Station. Mr. King told them
that he could not carry them that evening,
but if they would wait until morning, he
would carry them.  This they said, they
could not do, as they had business of impor-
tance to attend to and must go that night.
They then hired one mule from him, and
Kane rode rapidly for the Station, passing
through this place by a back way, about
dusk, and arriving at Easley, just in time
to take the 9 o'clock train going North. He
gave a negro ten cents to carry the mule to 
the livery stable, with instructions to send
it back to Mr. Baylis Hendricks, at this place,
where the officials had told Mr. King they
desired the mule to ride to.
   It appears that two shots were fired at
Ladd, the first taking effect and killing him,
while the second missed.  From this fact,
and the fact that Kane rode off Mr. King's 
mule, and left immediately on the train, it is 
supposed he did the killing.  The other three
went across the country towards Greenville
on foot, and at this writing we know not 
where they are.
Mr. John L. Gravley came to town Sunday
night and informed Trial Justice Taylor of
the murder, who at once issued a warrant
and placed it in the hands of the Sheriff, and
that officer at once started in pursuit of the
murderers.  Mr. Gravely had been informed
that Hoffman was one of the party, and was
the only one known by the parties giving him
the information, but from Mr. King's state-
ment, who knows the men, it is possible that
a mistake was made, and that Hoffman was
not with the party; if he was, he did not go
to King's store.  When the Sheriff arrived at
Easley he learned of the flight of Kane and 
on Monday morning as soon as the telegraph
offices were opened, sent off the following
message:
EASLEY, PICKENS Co., S.C., June 10, 1878
   To the Chief of Police of Greenville, Spar-
tanburg, Charlotte, and Columbia. A man
by the name of Ladd, was brutally murdered
in this County yesterday by five Revenue
officers, named Hoffman, Cain, Scruggs, 
Durham, and Mouse.  The have fled.  Look 
out for them.     JOAB MAUDLIN. S.P.C
  As above stated, it is probable that there is
a mistake as to Hoffman being with the party, 
but as to the others, there is no mistake, for
Mr. King and others know them well.-
It is likely, if Kane kept on he had left
Charlotte before the Sheriff's telegram reach-
ed that place, and may succeed in making 
good his escape for the time being.  The
others, we think, will be captured.
   From all the facts gathered by us, we 
pronounce this one of the most fiendish,
cold blooded murders ever committed in this
County.  But we will refrain from further
comments until the case has been properly
investigated.

  Since the above was put in type, Sheriff
Mauldin has received the following telegram:
"Kane, Scruggs, Durham, and Mouse, sur-
rendered to the Sheriff of Greenville."
JNO. G. Greer, Chief Police.

  The Greenville News speaking of this, the
 surrender of the parties says: Why they did
not go to Pickens C. H. and surrender to the 
Sheriff of that County, we are not informed.
The reason may be, that they suppose at
Greenville they may, like Deputy Marshal
Springs did a few day s ago, for a similar
outrage, give a bond, with negro sureties,
for their appearance at Court.

The follow up to the case, which took place four years later (the poor mother!), which I have included at the bottom of this post, includes names such as Salathiel (the brother to the murdered), Adeline Redmond (the sister to the murdered and wife of noted moonshiner Redmond) and Milly (the mother of the murdered).  Given that Amos and Salathiel are both family names in my ancestry, and the this takes place in Pickens, South Carolina, where my family is from, poor Amos Ladd has to be related.

Let's figure out how.

From the newspaper articles, this is what I know:
Mother - Milly Ladd
Children - Amos, Salathiel Ladd and Adeline Ladd Redmond
The murder happened in 1878, when Amos was about 21.  So he was born in 1857 or so.

My 3x great-grandfather Joseph Balanger Ladd was born in 1845, so Amos, Salathiel and Adeline are all in his generation.

You remember that post when I was talking about my ancestor Salathiel/Thile/Thyer/Theo/etc.? He was the brother of my 4x great-grandfather Pleasant Easley Ladd.  That makes him my 4x great-uncle.  He was married to Millie.  A few of his children, according to the censuses2: Salathiel (Thail M. in the 1850 census; Martin in the 1860 and 1870 censuses), Adeline (Malinda A in the 1860 census, Adeline in the 1870 census) and our poor Amos (Amos in both the 1960 and 1870 censuses).

So Amos and I are related through my 5x great-grandfather, John Ladd, who was Amos's grandfather. So we are 1st cousins, 5x removed.

Moonshining in the mountains of Appalachia. Real southern folk, y'all.

Further reading: In doing research, I found there are actually books written about this! Once Upon A Time in Pickens County - The Amos Ladd and Lewis Redmond Story is an .Old Pendleton District Publication. And King of the Moonshiners: Lewis Redmond in Fact and Fiction is all about Adeline's notorious moonshiner husband, Lewis Redmond.  Apparently he was an "archetypal moonshiner," a "national celebrity," a household name, and had the reputation of the most dangerous man in southern Appalachia.

Here's how the story wrapped up:

TLDR: The murderers were found not guilty. :( Poor Amos.


1 http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/about


    2 This is partially a false statement - the censuses didn't list relation to the head of the household until 1880. I am fairly sure that this are his children, and I have some other records to support this.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

AG/CG

I'm currently working on becoming an accredited genealogist (AG).  I would like to get my certification (CG) too someday.  Ultimately, I would love to research full time and be paid to travel the world and research in various archives.

As far as I can tell and what my research has told me is that the main difference between the AG and the CG is scope of focus.  The CG is more generalized while the AG specializes in a region of your choice. (I am focusing on Mid-South: North and South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee.) The AG process is intense, requiring a minimum of 1000 research hours, at least 500 of which are actual research as opposed to education, and 80 hours in each of the states in the region of choice.  Then there is an 8 hour written test, where they test your ability to transcribe and abstract handwritten records, identify different types of records, etc. etc.  And then they put you in front of a panel of specialists in that region and they grill you on what you did and didn't do.  Basically like a thesis defense. Oh, and I forgot to mention the four-generation project with a 60 page research report.

If you know me, you know I tend to exaggerate.  The report only has to be 25-40 pages.

So basically it's scary.  And intimidating.  I'm taking part in a study group right now with one other student trying to get her AG and two mentors to help us through the process.  And by student  I mean she has been researching full time for years and is already a CG. (And I was told the CG is harder to get than the AG.) Our mentors are super specialists and extremely knowledgeable about research and about the process of accreditation.  They are amazing and I'm so lucky to be learning from them all.

And then there is me.

I think that there is a stigma - and some of it might be in my mind/due to my own self-doubt - about how young I am.  It's automatically assumed that because I'm so young, I can't possibly have  experience or know what I'm talking about.  I was once asked by a researcher to speak to someone more "knowledgeable" than I - and when my supervisor gave the lady the exact same answer I had already given her, I felt validated in the knowledge that I actually do know what I'm talking about.  But sometimes, I doubt myself.

And then there are finds like that find I made yesterday that restore all confidence plus some.

George James Smith1 was orphaned at a young age.  He was born in 1927 and by 1930, he was in an orphanage, along with his older brother.  He remembers nothing at all about his parents.  The story goes that they were killed in a car accident.  Who are they?

A.  Through a series of email correspondence and internet searches, I tracked down the people who are in charge of the records from the orphanage the boys were in.  It appears that in order to get the information, I have to submit a request and obtain the permission of the birth parents.  Uh... (I have yet to call and speak to someone to explain my goal and situation.  I called, but it went to voicemail.)

B. I found a birth certificate for both him and his brother listing a mother's name as Emma Taylor. (spelled differently on each certificate)  No father's name listed.

C. I started searching the state death indexes for two individuals with the last name of Smith2 who died sometime between 1927 (birth year) and 1930 (when the boys are in the orphanage).

After more hours of this than I maybe want to admit.... I went back to square one and threw away everything I thought I knew.

What did I really know?


  1. I know that George Smith was born in 1927.
  2. I know that by 1930 he was in an orphanage, which means:
    • either one or both parents had died
    • or both children were given up for adoption.
      • I'm going to operate under the guess that one or both parents had died.
  3. I know that according to the birth certificate, the mother's name is Emma Taylor .
  4. I don't know that the parents died in a car accident.  That's a family story and as we say in my family, never let the truth get in the way of a good story.
So with that, I broadened my search.  Instead of looking for two people, I started with finding just one of them.  Since I knew the mother's name, I started there.

And what do you know.  

After searching for the mother, I ended up finding a death certificate for a Phillip James Smith, married to a Emily Tailer. I was 85% sure this was likely my guy.  Here's why:
  1. His death date was in the right range - 1928.  
  2. The wife's name was pretty similar to the name I was looking for - both first names starting with the same letter, last name a logical misspelling of the known last name.  
  3. Last name was the last name that I was looking for.
  4. Middle name was the same as the individual I started with.
  5. First name was the same as another boy with that last name in the orphanage in 1930.  Another son?
After doing more searching, I'm 99.9% sure that he's my guy.  

That was yesterday.  And I've already traced four generations.

(said very humbly) Aren't I amazing?






1 Names have been changed to protect the privacy of the individuals involved.

2 Luckily, the actual last name that I am working with is a little bit more unique.